Legal Opinion
Foxfire, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 8, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-166. Court No. 93-09-00537PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge:
This case is before the pourt after trial de novo. Plaintiff, Foxfire Inc., challenges the decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) denying plaintiffs protest against Customs’ liquidation of the subject merchandise. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1988).
Plaintiff imports certain outerware garments from Australia. Upon' importation, Customs classified the garments under sub headings 6202.12.2010, HTSUS (other women’s raincoats); 1 6202.92.2061, HTSUS (other women’s cotton anoraks (jackets), other than water resistant); 2 and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pima Western, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- United States v. H. Rosenthal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Verosol USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Baldwin Park Free Speech Coalition v. City of Baldwin ParkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Baldwin Park Free Speech Coalition v. City of Baldwin ParkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021