Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Yopst
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The complaint of the appellee is based upon the statute defining the duties of telegraph companies, :and prescribing a penalty for a breach of duty. This penalty the appellee seeks to recover.
The principal objection urged against the complaint is that the telegram was received on Sunday, and that as it *250does not appear that there was any necessity for receiving or transmitting it on that day, the contract which underlies the duty is invalid, and hence no recovery can be adjudged. It is true, as counsel assert, that a contract is essential to create a duty. Rogers v. Western U. Tel. Co., 78…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Crocket v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Hockett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Natural Gas Products Co. v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- James v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Johnson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.