Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Cadwell
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 14, 1930No. 2270PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
This interference proceeding, which is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, involves the question of priority of an invention of a process for vulcanizing rubber.
The value of the invention is emphasized by the size of the record (more than .2,500 pages) and the briefs (more than 300 pages). There are more than 100 exhibits in the case, and a great number of legal questions are raised and argued at length, most of which questions require no consideration by us.
The interference is between two patents numbered 1,434,892 and 1,434,908, of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Bedford v. HuntU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1817
- Reed v. CutterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
3Cited by8 opinions
- Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. BrandesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Morway v. BondiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Kyrides v. BrusonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Larson v. EicherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.