Legal Opinion
Wrobleski v. De Lara
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 16, 1999No. 88, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
This is a medical malpractice case. Linda Wrobleski claimed that Nora de Lara negligently damaged Ms. Wrobleski’s small intestine during a laparoscopic procedure performed by Dr. de Lara on June 6, 1994. That damage led to significant complications, resulting in a lot of pain to Ms. Wrobleski and the need for two corrective surgeries. A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City found no negligence on Dr. de Lara’s part, and from the judgment entered upon that verdict, Ms. Wrobleski appealed. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. Wrobleski v. de Lara, 121 Md.App. 181, 708…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- H. E. Collins and Joetta Collins, Surviving Parents and Personal Representatives of Karen Collins, Deceased v. Wayne CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Elkins v. SykenSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Wilson v. StilwillMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Witte v. AzarianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Cooper v. SchoffstallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Behler v. HanlonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.