Legal Opinion

Witte v. Azarian

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 18, 2002No. 103, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

At issue before us is the proper construction of Maryland Code, § 3-2A-04(b)(4) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, which is part of the law dealing with the resolution of health care malpractice claims. Section 3-2A-04 requires that such claims, if seeking compensation in an amount that exceeds the jurisdiction of the District Court, be filed initially with the Health Claims Arbitration Office (HCAO).

In 1986, the General Assembly amended the law to require that unless, within 90 days after the filing of the claim, the claimant files with the HCAO a certificate of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Beyer v. Morgan State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Liverpool v. Baltimore Diamond Exchange Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API