Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Hardwick

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1925No. Civil No. 2245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoALISTEB, C. J.

— Lee Arnett, assignee of three promissory notes executed by appellee, Thomas J. Hardwick, in favor of Buby and Bowers, brought this action to enforce their collection. A general demurrer to the complaint was filed by appellee July 16, 1921, but no ruling thereon was ever made nor was any further action taken in the case until April 2, 1923, when it was dismissed with prejudice at appellant’s cost. The appeal is from the order of dismissal which was entered upon the authority of Bule 16 of the superior court of Mohave county. This rule reads as follows:

“Bule 16. Delay Docket. When any case,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hatch v. LeightonArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Skelsey v. KuhnArizona Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paulley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Brown v. HaymoreArizona Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API