Legal Opinion
Lanners v. National Family Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1988No. C7-87-2173PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring two insurance companies liable for payment of no-fault benefits. The insurance companies contend the insured was operating a business vehicle at the time of the accident and is not entitled to recover benefits under his personal automobile insurance policy. We reverse.
PACTS
Respondent James H. Lanners was the sole proprietor of Lanners Construction, an unincorporated construction business. Lanners owned six vehicles and insured the vehicles under two separate policies. A 1978 Ford pickup, a 1969 Ford pickup and a trailer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Koons v. National Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Klein v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Rydberg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992