Legal Opinion

State v. Montgomery

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 28, 2007No. 051272253; A131343PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of contempt based on a finding that she willfully dialed her ex-husband’s telephone number in violation of the terms of a restraining order. ORS 33.015(2)(b). Defendant asserted that she dialed the number accidentally. The trial court concluded that whether she did so accidentally was irrelevant to the question whether she acted in “willful” violation of the restraining order. Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in applying the wrong legal standard in determining whether she acted “willfully.” The state concedes the error. For the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In re Marriage of BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. CrombieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Elizabeth Lofts Condos. Owners' Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Lopez v. Oregon State HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API