Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Badger v. Couey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. CC 28564; CA A62175; SC S37940PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

The issue in this case is whether a trial court must find that a party acted both willfully and with bad intent before it may find the party guilty of contempt. The trial court found that respondent father willfully had disobeyed a court order, and it found him guilty of contempt. The Court of Appeals vacated the contempt judgment and remanded the case to the trial court to make findings on whether respondent had acted with a “bad intent.” Couey and Couey, 105 Or App 478, 805 P2d 716 (1991). We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals, and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

By a 1974…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Rust v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Bar v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Grover v. GroverOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. O'MALLEYOregon Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Mikkelsen v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. In re Marriage of BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Frady v. FradyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. In re the Marriage of SouthworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API