Legal Opinion

Theener v. Kurn and Lonsdale

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShain, P. J.

This action involves two suits that were Consolidated in the trial below and review is in accordance. The admitted facts in this case, which are involved in the issues before us for 'review, briefly stated are as follows: The defendants right-of-way runs along the south boundary of lands owned and operated by the plaintiffs and wherein live stock owned by plaintiffs were being pastured. Stock owned by each of plaintiffs escaped through a defective right-of-way fence of defendant into the railroad right-of-way and after escaping through a defective fence of defendant wandered out into U. S.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garesché v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Ingalsbe v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Eaton v. Mississippi River & Bonne Terre Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. McCaskey v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. State v. Hembree and JacobsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sill v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API