Garesché v. MacDonald
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Valliant, Judge. (1) Upon the facts proved the appellant was entitled to a decree. It was sufficient to show that the defendant Furlong sold the property in question with the intention of defrauding plaintiff thereby, and that such intention was known to defendant MacDonald at the time he purchased. The payment or non-payment of a consideration was immaterial.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Valliant, Judge. (1) Upon the facts proved the appellant was entitled to a decree. It was sufficient to show that the defendant Furlong sold the property in question with the intention of defrauding plaintiff thereby, and that such intention was known to defendant MacDonald at the time he purchased. The payment or non-payment of a consideration was immaterial. Dougherty v. Cooper, 77 Mo. 528 ; Shelley v. Boothe, 73 Mo. 74; Frederick v. Allgaier, 88 Mo. 598. (2) There was no such discrepancy between the case stated' in the pleadings and…
1Opinion of the CourtBrace, J.
This is an action to set aside a deed executed by defendant, John Furlong, on the ninth day of January, 1886, conveying to his codefendant MacDonald a lot or parcel of ground in the city of St. Louis described in the petition for the considei'ation of $2,000.
In the spring of 1885, the said John Furlong instituted in the St. Louis circuit court a suit for divorce against his wife, Ellen Furlong. The cause was heard on the thirteenth of November, 1885, and taken under advisement. On the ninth of December, 1885, the following order was made and entered of record in the case: “ It is ordered that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Sexton v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Dougherty v. CooperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Frederick v. AllgaierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Funkhouser v. LaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Finke v. BoyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- State ex rel. Crandall v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Jones v. NicholsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Scharff v. McGaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.