Legal Opinion

McCaskey v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Sullivan Circuit Court. — Hon. Fred Lamb, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The appeal in this case is from a judgment plaintiff recovered in the circuit court of' Sullivan county in an action for a breach by defendant of its duty to maintain lawful fences on the sides of its railroad where the same passes through the country. A horse owned by plaintiff escaped from a pasture, which was enclosed by a lawful fence, to a public road, traveled a mile or more along that road to a place where an opening in the fence on the north side afforded him access to a private road which ran north to and across defendant’s railroad. There were no cattle guards at this crossing and a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gorman v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  2. Litton v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Hill v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Hill v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Oyler v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ingalsbe v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Eaton v. Mississippi River & Bonne Terre Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Scott v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Theener v. Kurn and LonsdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Hackworth v. Missouri Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API