Silica Brick Co. v. Winsor
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
In this case judgment was entered on the pleadings in favor of plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from the court’s order denying his motion for leave to amend his second amended answer.
The action was one to recover the amount of a subscription for the capital stock of the plaintiff. Defendant admitted the due execution by him of the document, set forth by copy in the complaint, by which he subscribed for five thousand shares of the preferred stock of the plaintiff corporation agreeing to pay five thousand dollars for said stock at the option and on demand of the Silica…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williamson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Bank of Shasta v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Pac. Fruit Co. v. CoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Hoyt v. BeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Thomas v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bossert v. StokesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Edwards v. California Sweet Potato Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- In re: MASSROCK, INC., D/B/A Lenders AssuranceUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.