Pac. Fruit Co. v. Coon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The plaintiff is a private corporation, organized in this state for commercial and manufacturing purposes, whose principal place of business “is San Francisco, California,” and brought this action to recover from the defendant an assessment of five dollars per share on his stock (100 shares) in the corporation.
The judgment of the court was in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals therefrom, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It is alleged in the complaint, among other things:
“ That on the 11th day of May, 1891, said corporation, plaintiff herein, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mitchell v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- California Southern Hotel Co. v. CallenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Garretson v. Pacific Crude Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Anglo California National Bank v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Cotter v. Butte & Ruby Valley Smelting Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Shively v. Eureka Tellurium Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.