Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Gunter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Certiorari to Court of Appeals. Application by the state on the relation of the Attorney General for mandamus directed to the judge of the Montgomery City Court to require him to re-sentence certain prisoners. The Court of Appeals granted the writ of mandamus and respondent filed petition for certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks to review the judg- . ment of the Court of Appeals by which that court ordered a writ of mandamus to the judge of the city court of Montgomery, commanding him to pronounce sentence according to law upon Minto and Adams who had-been duly convicted in the trial court. The cases against Minto and Adams were identical in every respect, and a history of them may be found in Ex Parte Adams, 187 Ala. 10, 65 South. 514; Minto v. State, 8 Ala. App. 306, 62 South. 376; Adams v. State, 9 Ala. App. 89, 64 South. 371; Minto v. State, 9 Ala. App. 95, 64 South. 369, and State ex rel.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Ex Parte SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Sennott's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Powell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  2. State v. Superior Court of Pinal CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hicks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Daley v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Pounders v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API