Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1926No. 6 Div. 746PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The'contention of appellant as to refused charge No. 1 is not sustained by the record. The court properly charged the jury as to what constitutes the “curtilage” of a dwelling. Madry v. State, 201 Ala. 512, 78 So. 866.

The trial judge in a careful and explicit manner charged the jury as to all the different degrees of homicide, as to self-defense under every phase in which it was presented, and as to the presumption of innocence and a reasonable doubt. ’ Having done this the court gave at the request of defendant 39 charges emphasizing the defendant’s contentions. There were only 12 written…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Madry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Ex parte RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Bennie L. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Nix v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Graham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API