Hicks v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The'contention of appellant as to refused charge No. 1 is not sustained by the record. The court properly charged the jury as to what constitutes the “curtilage” of a dwelling. Madry v. State, 201 Ala. 512, 78 So. 866.
The trial judge in a careful and explicit manner charged the jury as to all the different degrees of homicide, as to self-defense under every phase in which it was presented, and as to the presumption of innocence and a reasonable doubt. ’ Having done this the court gave at the request of defendant 39 charges emphasizing the defendant’s contentions. There were only 12 written…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Madry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Ex parte RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Bennie L. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Nix v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
- Graham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.