Dobson v. Commissioner
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
Petition for rehearing in two of the four cases decided together on December 20,1943 states that these contained an issue not present and not considered in the main case. In these two cases the Tax Court held that recoveries by these taxpayers in 1939 did constitute taxable income. It held, also, that the recovery was taxable as ordinary income, despite taxpayer’s contention that it should be taxed as capital gain under § 117 of the Internal Revenue Code. This contention, the petition says, presents questions of law to be determined by this Court, rather than of fact finally to be determined…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Helvering v. HammelSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fairbanks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Helvering v. William Flaccus Oak Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Electro-Chemical Engraving Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Helvering v. Nebraska Bridge Supply & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
3Cited by60 opinions
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Putoma Corp., Successor by Merger of Pro-Mac Company, Petitioners- Cross-Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Limericks, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Mayfair Minerals, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Harriss v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.