Legal Opinion

Electro-Chemical Engraving Co. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 6, 1941No. 62PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This' is a companion case to Helvering v. Hammel, ante, p. 504.

The question is whether the loss suffered by petitioner on foreclosure sale of his mortgaged property, acquired for profit, may be deducted in full from gross income or only to the extent provided by § 117 (d) of the 1934 Revenue Act. The statutory provisions involved are those of the 1934 Act relating to capital gains or losses, particularly “losses from sales or exchanges of capital assets” considered in the Hamrnel case which are made applicable to petitioner, a corporation, by § 23 (f) (j).

The Board of Tax Appeals ruled that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. ELECTRO-CHEMICAL E. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Megargel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  3. Danenberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  4. Hawaiian Gas Products v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Madden v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API