Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Laack

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1936No. Nos. 26297, 26298. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Two appeals are now before us involving the same transaction in the lower court in the matter of the above estate. The earlier history of the controversy over this "estate can be found in Laack v. Hawkins, 155 Wash. 308, 284 Pac. 89, decided January 21, 1930.

Respondent Julia Ostby, by mesne conveyances from the former trustee of the last will of the testator, has become the owner of the property referred to as the Holgate hotel, in Seattle.

On the former appeal, this court found that the lower court had considered and approved the sale of that real estate, although it was in some respects…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dane v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Griffin v. WarburtonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Sturgiss v. DartWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Parkes v. BurkhartWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Lushington v. Seattle Auto & Driving ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. GooleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Swak v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Foster v. BradyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hill v. BiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In Re Olson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API