Legal Opinion

Lushington v. Seattle Auto & Driving Club

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1910No. 9125PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered May 25, 1910, vacating a default judgment for want of jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiff began an action against defendant, a local corporation, and served a summons and complaint upon one J. H. Van Asselt. At the time of service plaintiff believed, and the return of service recites, that Van Asselt was president of the defendant. In fact, his term of office had expired a few weeks before, and at the time of service he had no official connection with the company. Upon a show*547ing of these facts, the trial judge set aside the default and judgment, and plaintiff has appealed.

Appellant urges a state of facts which he insists should' estop respondent from questioning the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dane v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bennett v. Supreme Tent of the Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Sturgiss v. DartWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Brandt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Hoefer v. SawtelleWashington Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. GooleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Chehalis Coal Co. v. LaisureWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Tropic Builders, Ltd. v. Naval Ammunition Depot Lualualei Quarters, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Sakai v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hatch v. Princess Louise Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API