Meyer v. Ewald
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
While there are six essential elements which must be proved in this state in a successful action for malicious prosecution, 1 in the case before us, as is usual, 2 the dispute is as to two of the six: (1) Whether there was malice in the instituting of criminal proceedings; and (2) whether there was a want of probable cause for instituting such proceedings. Each of these two elements, both required to be proved by plaintiff in order for him to prevail, 3 will be separately discussed.
Requirement of malice.
Malice, which gives the action its name, must be established in any successful lawsuit for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Federal Land Bank v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Elmer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Gladfelter v. DoemelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Yelk v. SeefeldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Gaddis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Johnson v. K-Mart Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Kaminske v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Cameron v. Farrell Area School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.