Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Ewald

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1974No. 269PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

While there are six essential elements which must be proved in this state in a successful action for malicious prosecution, 1 in the case before us, as is usual, 2 the dispute is as to two of the six: (1) Whether there was malice in the instituting of criminal proceedings; and (2) whether there was a want of probable cause for instituting such proceedings. Each of these two elements, both required to be proved by plaintiff in order for him to prevail, 3 will be separately discussed.

Requirement of malice.

Malice, which gives the action its name, must be established in any successful lawsuit for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Elmer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Gladfelter v. DoemelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Yelk v. SeefeldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Gaddis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Johnson v. K-Mart Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Kaminske v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Cameron v. Farrell Area School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API