Legal Opinion

Gladfelter v. Doemel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1958PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuRrie, J.

The defendant advances the following contentions on this appeal:(1) That he made a full and fair disclosure of all the facts within his knowledge to the district attorney and signed the criminal complaint against the plaintiff in reliance upon the advice of such district attorney, thereby establishing probable cause as a matter of law.(2) That the defendant had probable cause to believe the plaintiff guilty as a matter of law.(3) That the trial court committed prejudicial error in admitting evidence relating to Oshkosh Poultry Products, Inc., and the separate legal proceedings instituted by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. PhersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Luther v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Elmer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  4. King v. Apple River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Brinsley v. SchulzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. David K. Guenther v. Mark Holmgreen and City of Black River FallsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Fahrenberg v. TengelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. JahnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Malco, Inc. v. Midwest Aluminum Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API