Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank v. Birchfield

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1939No. Record No. 2059PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

This action, based on defamatory statements, was instituted by W. V. Birchfield against the Federal Land Bank of Baltimore. The trial court entered judgment for $1,500 on the jury’s verdict for plaintiff. To that judgment defendant in the trial court obtained this writ of error.

Plaintiff began the action by filing a petition for an attachment, on the ground that the Federal Land Bank of Baltimore was a non-resident corporation. All the attachments that were served upon the different parties, alleged in the petition to be indebted to the Federal Land Bank of Baltimore, were dismissed. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Massie v. FirmstoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. P. Lorillard Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. New River Mineral Co. v. PainterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. McLaughlin v. SiegelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Fuste v. Riverside Healthcare Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Woodrum v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. M. Rosenberg & Sons, Inc. v. CraftSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  4. Sutherland v. Kroger CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Government Micro Resources, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API