Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1968No. 36750PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
160 N.W.2d 223 (1968)
183 Neb. 398
R. K. RUTHERFORD; Nebraska Investment Company, a Nebraska Corporation, Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF OMAHA, a Municipal Corporation et al., Appellees,
Oddo's Drive In, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation, Intervener-Appellant.
No. 36750.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
July 19, 1968.
Ross & O'Connor, Omaha, for appellants and intervener-appellant.
Herbert Fitle, City Atty., Edward M. Stein, Edward A. Mullery, Omaha, for appellees.
Heard before WHITE, C. J., and CARTER, SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN and NEWTON, JJ.
SMITH, Justice.
Plaintiffs' and intervener's petitions concerning…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Call Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Gericke v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Sharp v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Bexar County v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of DunedinSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- T v. Transmission, Inc. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Dapec, Inc. v. Small Business Administration (In re MBA Poultry, L.L.C.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- In Re: Mba Poultry, L.L.C., Debtor. Dapec, Inc. v. Small Business Administration, U.S., City of Tecumseh, Interested Party, the Money Store Bird Watchers, L.L.C., Interested Parties/appellees. Dapec, Inc. v. Small Business Administration, U.S., City of Tecumseh, Interested Party/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- DAPEC v. SBACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.