Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Hall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 17, 1947No. 32983PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, V.C.J.

In November, 1946, the City of' Muskogee passed an ordinance establishing fees for the use of public sewers by its inhabitants, and providing that the net profits should be placed in the general fund. For the purpose of fixing the rates, two classifications were made: dwellings were put on a flat per month rate; commercial users were charged on a sliding scale determined by the amount of water used. The sewer charge was added to each water bill and a failure to pay the total of water fee and sewer fee *679was made a cause for discontinuance of water service. The charge was made…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Gericke v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Carson v. Brockton Sewerage CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. State v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. Perrine v. Bonaparte, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Roth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  3. Rash v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. City of Maryville v. CushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Rupp v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API