Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. Kennett
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
An insurer’s duty to defend an action for negligence brought against the person insured should, as a general rule, be determined before trial through proceedings for a declaratory judgment. American &c. Ins. Co. v. Garage, 86 N. H. 362; Gibbs v. Company, 87 N. H. 19, 21; American &c. Ins. Co. v. Bush, 88 N. H. 383, 385; Laporte v. Houle, ante, 50.
And because this is the approved procedure by which a liability insurance company may ascertain the extent of coverage without assuming the defence of the suit and thereby admitting its liability, no price is exacted from the company for taking the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Faulkner v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- Travelers Insurance v. GreenoughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Conway v. New Hampshire Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- American Motorists Insurance v. Central GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- American Motorists Insuarance v. RushSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Taos County Board of Education v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Temperance Insurance Exchange v. CarverIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Binda v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Co. v. TobermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Beaudoin v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.