Legal Opinion

Conway v. New Hampshire Water Resources Board

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 5, 1938PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

Whether the taxpayers in their case may properly seek to enjoin the illegal expenditure of state funds, appears to present an inquiry of new impression in this forum. Their right when the funds belong to municipal corporations is well settled. Blood v. Company, 68 N. H. 340, and cases cited; Clough v. Verrette, 79 N. H. 356. The better reasoning is thought to extend the right to state appropriations and expenditures. While the State cannot be sued without its consent (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. State, 64 N. H. 265, 271; Bow v. Plummer, 79 N. H. 23, 24), and while a suit against those…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ethington v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Water & Power Resources Board v. Green Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. O'NEIL v. ThomsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Jones v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API