American Motorists Insuarance v. Rush

Since there is no suggestion that the insurance company was harmed by the denial of its motion to enjoin trial of the Brackett actions, the exception to the denial of this motion is overruled. It is the proper as well as the convenient method of procedure, however, to determine definitely by a transfer to this court the pre liminary question of coverage before trial of suits against an insured. American &c. Insurance Co. v. Garage, 86 N. H. 362, 364; Sauriolle v. O’Gorman, 86 N. H. 39, 49. See also Gibbs v. Company, 87 N. H. 19, 20; Howe v. Howe, 87 N. H. 338, 339; Maryland Casualty Co. v.…