Legal Opinion

Michigan Central Railroad v. Bullard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Calhoun; Smith, J. Summary proceedings by the Michigan Central Railroad Company against George A. Bullard to recover the possession of real estate. From a judgment for complainant on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a summary proceeding to *417recover possession of a parcel of land in the city of Marshall. The circuit judge directed a verdict for complainant, and defendant brings error.

The property in question is a portion of what complainant claims as its right of way or depot grounds. The complainant introduced a lease of the premises to defendant, and showed that he had failed to surrender the premises according to its terms of rental. The defendant then sought to show that he was himself the owner of the premises, and had been for many years before the lease was executed, and was in possession…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gurney v. Minneapolis Union Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Illinois Central R. R. v. WathenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
  4. Fuller v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Neitzel v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Farnsworth v. . Boro Oil Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Richmond Cotton Oil Co. v. CastellawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. State v. New Orleans Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  5. City of Detroit v. C. H. Little Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API