Legal Opinion

Richmond Cotton Oil Co. v. Castellaw

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 27, 1910PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Injunction. Before Judge Reagan. Henry superior court.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. The owner or occupier of a lot in a town has no right, by reason of that fact; to have an injunction to prevent a railroad company, the line of which runs near his property, from allowing a house to be built and occupied by its licensee for the storage of cottonseed to be forwarded over its line of railway, on the ground that such action is ultra vires of the company.(a) On the subject of permitting a licensee to use part of a railroad right of way for storing freight to be transported by the railroad company, thus increasing its freights, and so as not to injuriously affect its power to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gurney v. Minneapolis Union Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Illinois Central R. R. v. WathenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
  4. Bailey v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  5. Harrison v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. KahnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Holman v. Athens Empire Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. OverbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Griffith v. City of HapevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API