Legal Opinion

Urban v. Fossati

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1954No. 12653PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This case concerns the construction of the residuary clause to a holographic will. More specifically, the question is whether the testatrix disposed of all-the balance of her entire estate by the residuary clause, or whether she disposed only of all that remained out of certain named funds. The will is short and is as follows:

My Last Will and Testament

“Aug 27 — 1949
“My Lalst Will And Testament
“>C J Fossati
“Dear Newphew when I die you sell this Home and Cleck my Inshurens Pollis and pay all of my debts and you get $200 Dolls, Two Hunters Dolls for you work, giv the Churches sum…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Darragh v. BarmoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. In Re the Estate of HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bittner v. BittnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Lightfoot v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carr v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Goggans v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Swearingen v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Wenzel v. MenchacaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Alexander v. BotsfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API