Legal Opinion

Carr v. Rogers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1964No. A-10127PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULVER, Justice.

The duly appointed executors of the estate of Birdie H. Frey brought this suit to have the court construe Mrs. Frey’s holographic last Will and Testament. The only question presented here is whether or not Mrs. Frey died intestate as to a part of the property she owned at the time of her death. The trial court answered this question in the negative. The Court of Civil Appeals, one justice dissenting, reversed, holding that the Will as properly construed did not dispose of the entire estate. 376 S.W.2d 413.1

Mrs. Frey, at the time of her death, had been a widow for a number of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stanford v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huffman v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. HanksTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Briggs v. PeeblesTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Bittner v. BittnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AlexanderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Stewart v. SelderTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hilco Electric Cooperative v. Midlothian Butane Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Haile v. HoltzclawTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Van Hoose v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API