Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1931No. 4757PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Amerman

The facts of this case are embraced in the majority opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals reported in 288 S. W., 833, and need not be repeated here.

There is only one question in this case: Was the will of ' Mrs. Morton a contingent or a conditional will, intended by her to take effect only upon the happening of her death during a contemplated journey?

Her will, written entirely in her own handwriting, reads as follows:

“LAST WILL OF

Telephone No. 53 Postoffice Box 92.

KATE F. MORTON

Haskell, Texas, May 5th, 1924

I am going on a journey and I. may never come back alive so I make this Will, but I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eaton v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Dougherty v. HolscheiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Shriner's Hospital for Crippled Children of Texas v. StahlTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Haile v. HoltzclawTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Briggs v. PeeblesTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Van Hoose v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Kuehn v. BremerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API