Legal Opinion

In Re Boyce

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1959No. Crim. 6368PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHENK, J.—In

this proceeding the petitioner, Charles Howard Boyce, seeks a writ of habeas corpus while confined in the state prison at Soledad under a 1957 judgment of conviction of burglary. It is contended that, because he was denied the right of counsel at the time he was sentenced, his present confinement is illegal.

The attorney general, in behalf of Lawrence E. Wilson, superintendent of the prison at Soledad, has filed a return consisting in part of excerpts from the clerk’s minutes in the criminal proceedings. (People v. Charles Howard Boyce, No. 8186, Kern County Superior Court.) It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LeviCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In Re PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In Re TurrietaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re Van BruntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. TinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API