Legal Opinion

In Re Turrieta

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1960No. Crim. 6641PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Albert M. Bendich and H. Leroy Cannon seek a writ of habeas corpus for and on behalf of Lucy Turrieta, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, on the ground that she was not properly advised of her right to counsel (Cal. Const., art I, § 13) in proceedings for sentencing following the revocation of her probation after conviction.

The petitioner, on November 7, 1957, in justice court, pleaded guilty to two charges of petty theft. The record shows that she was advised of her legal rights, and an affidavit of the trial judge satisfactorily discloses that she, at that time, waived counsel. On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In re LeviCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. In Re PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. In Re KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API