Legal Opinion

People v. Tiner

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1970No. Crim. 3852PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

In an indictment returned by the Grand Jury of San Bernardino County, defendant was charged in count I with sale of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11531), and in count II with selling a restricted dangerous drug (Health & Saf. Code, § 11912). By amendment to the indictment, defendant was further charged with two prior felony convictions, both for violation of Health and Safety Code, section 11500 (possession of a narcotic other than marijuana).

Defendant entered a plea of not guilty. A denial of the two prior convictions was entered in his behalf. Thereafter, out of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. BerutkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. DelgadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. People v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. GroceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. State v. SampleArizona Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API