Legal Opinion

Erie Insurance Group v. Fisher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 84-43PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.

This appeal presents two issues for resolution. First, under what circumstances does the right to a jury trial exist in a declaratory judgment action? Second, once initial permission has been granted to use an automobile, for what scope of operations does the user remain a permitted user for purposes of coverage under the omnibus clause of an insurance policy?

A controversy between an insurer and its insured as to its liability or duty to defend is properly determinable by a declaratory judgment action. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Cochrane (1951), 155 Ohio St. 305 [44 O.O. 302], paragraph one…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CochraneOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Continental Insurance v. WhittingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Leber v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Monsler v. Cincinnati Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API