Legal Opinion
Bower v. Weisman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 10, 1987No. 85 Civ. 8916 (RWS)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sachiko Bower (“Bower”) has moved to compel answers to certain questions and the production of certain documents which have been withheld by defendant Frederick Weisman (“Weisman”) on the grounds of attorney client privilege. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Information Withheld
The information withheld by Weisman falls into five distinct categories:
1) Production of testamentary trust instruments and a videotaped codicil of Weis-man’s will.
2) Communications with Weisman’s attorneys Richard Gilbert and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. AronoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Drimmer v. AppletonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Diotima Shipping Corp. v. Chase, Leavitt & Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1984
- In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- In Re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Fine v. Facet Aerospace Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Falise v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.