Legal Opinion
Drimmer v. Appleton
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1986No. 83 Civ. 5237 (RWS)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Harold L. Drimmer (“Drimmer”) and Mount Hope Mines, Inc. (“MHM”) bring this motion to compel defendant Donald L. Appleton (“Appleton”) to appear for deposition and to answer certain questions pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 Appleton opposes this application for an order to compel him to answer these questions on the ground that they impinge on the attorney-client privilege, as they involve his conversations with counsel regarding settlement negotiations in a related Nevada State Court action. Because Appleton has waived…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States Ex Rel. Edney v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. Richard SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Fine v. Facet Aerospace Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.