Legal Opinion

Dugas v. Town of Conway

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 3, 1984No. 83-303PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The plaintiff appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Wyman, J.) denying his motion for attorney’s fees and double costs. He argues that a plaintiff who is compelled to bear the financial burden of the administrative and judicial process, to protect his *178clearly established property right from an unconstitutional taking, is entitled to attorney’s fees and double costs.

The record reveals the following facts. The plaintiff, Joseph F. Dugas, is the owner of the Conway Shopping Center in Conway, New Hampshire. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (A & P) was a long-time lessee of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Metzger v. Town of BrentwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Durant v. Town of DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. L. Grossman & Sons, Inc. v. Town of GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dumont v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Smith v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. Asselin v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Town of Chesterfield v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Board of Water Commissioners v. MooneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API