Legal Opinion
Town of Seabrook v. State of New Hampshire, Seabrook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule (Scdhr), Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 25, 1984No. 84-1187PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-intervenor Seabrook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule (“SCDHR”) appeals from summary judgment sustaining the constitutionality of certain New Hampshire statutes which regulate Sunday dog racing. While we might well agree with the district court’s resolution of the substantive issues, we affirm on another ground.
We are confronted by the fact that SCDHR has previously raised the same claim and many of the same legal arguments before the courts of New Hampshire in an action against basically the same defendants as here. 1 See Sea-brook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bricker v. CraneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Concrete Constructors, Inc. v. Manchester BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Laconia National Bank v. LavalleeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
- Boucher v. BaileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Headley v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Goldstein v. GalvinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Joseph J. Fiumara v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Cohen v. SheaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.