Legal Opinion

Vernet v. Town of Exeter

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1986No. 86-118PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This appeal is from a decision of the Superior Court {Nadeau, J.) that citizens of the town of Exeter may not prohibit the selectmen from implementing a nuclear emergency response plan by so voting at town meeting. We find no error and affirm. The issue to be decided is whether a town meeting vote, requiring that no town officials and agencies of Exeter be allowed to implement a State-approved plan for a possible nuclear disaster at the Seabrook nuclear plant, is a valid exercise of the powers of a town meeting. We hold that the town meeting vote, which attempted to restrict the selectmen’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  2. Public Service Co. v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. State v. WoodmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. State v. DriscollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Seabrook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule v. Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Pelham v. Browning Ferris Industries of New Hampshire, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Town of Rye v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API