Legal Opinion
Danial v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 15, 2019No. 1 CA-IC 17-0068PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINZWEIG, Judge:
*593¶1 This case involves an airport taxicab driver who sought workers' compensation benefits for injuries he sustained while driving a taxi he leased from a cab company. The Industrial Commission of Arizona ("ICA") found the injury was non-compensable because the driver was an independent contractor of the cab company rather than an employee for workers' compensation purposes. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 AAA Cab Services ("AAA") is a transportation business and one of three taxicab companies licensed to operate at Sky Harbor International Airport (the "Airport")…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Anton v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- La Grande v. B & L SERVICES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jani king/liberty v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- costco/helmsman v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020