Legal Opinion

State v. Maimona

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1969No. 293PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying, without hearing, defendant’s motion pursuant to Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1967)], in which defendant sought to vacate judgment and sentence entered subsequent to his guilty plea to the crime of robbery.

On December 20, 1966, defendant appeared in person and without counsel before a justice of the peace. Advised of his rights in court, defendant entered a plea of not guilty and requested counsel. Ten days later, no counsel having been appointed, defendant waived counsel and preliminary hearing, and entered a plea of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. KnerrNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State v. ArchieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. ReeceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ByrdNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BearlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Maimona v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. State v. SwimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Roman v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. BearlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API