State v. Swim
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIÓN
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Defendants’ petitions for post conviction relief, Rule 93 (§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953, (Rpl. Vol. 4), were denied,' without an evidentiary hearing. The court, after reviewing the allegations of the petitions, and the files and records of the case, determined that “ * * * it is' conclusively shown that defendants are not entitled to relief under Rule 93.” ‘ Appeal is from the trial court’s orders denying relief as to each defendant. We reverse.
The sole contention upon appeal is that: “The Court erred in failing to grant appellants an evidentiary hearing upon their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. FuentesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. BuchananNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ReeceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GuerroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bobrick v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017