Legal Opinion

State v. Swim

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1971No. 551PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINIÓN

SPIESS, Chief Judge.

Defendants’ petitions for post conviction relief, Rule 93 (§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953, (Rpl. Vol. 4), were denied,' without an evidentiary hearing. The court, after reviewing the allegations of the petitions, and the files and records of the case, determined that “ * * * it is' conclusively shown that defendants are not entitled to relief under Rule 93.” ‘ Appeal is from the trial court’s orders denying relief as to each defendant. We reverse.

The sole contention upon appeal is that: “The Court erred in failing to grant appellants an evidentiary hearing upon their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. FuentesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. BuchananNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. ReeceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GuerroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Bobrick v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API