Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bearly

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1991No. 12240Published

1DissentApodaca, Judge

I disagree with the majority that we must remand the case to the trial court on the issue of prejudice. The record reflects that the trial court made specific findings of prejudice due to defendant’s inability to obtain a blood test during a crucial period of time. These findings were not challenged on appeal by the state. Aside from its reliance on a few cases, the state devoted only one sentence in its answer brief to contend that “[djefendant has failed to show actual prejudice,” without challenging the trial court’s findings. We are thus bound by them, and a remand, in my view, would be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GibbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. KnerrNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. State v. MaimonaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API