Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Worcester v. Donnellon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1990No. 89-1795PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

“In order to grant a writ of mandamus, a court must find that the relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that the respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law.” State, ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc., v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42, 15 O.O. 3d 53, 399 N.E. 2d 81, paragraph one of the syllabus.

In Ohio a court speaks through its journal. Accordingly, it is imperative that the court’s journal reflect the truth. In Hollister v. Judges of Dist. Court (1857), 8 Ohio St. 201, 70 Am. Dec. 100, we…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Klein v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Neff v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Infinite Security Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties II, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State ex rel. Martre v. Reed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API