Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Proffitt

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1914No. 1247PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; Edmund Waddill, Jr., Judge. Action by Claude U. Proffitt against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law, instituted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error, defendant below, under the provisions of the “Employers’ Liability Act” (Act April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35 Stat. 65 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, P-1322]), for the recovery of $20,000 damages on account of personal injuries sustained while the plaintiff below was endeavoring to couple the different section's of a train belonging to the defendant below. The jury returned a verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Northern Pac. R. Co. v. CharlessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
  4. Fitch v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  4. McCoy v. CateCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  5. DeMoss v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API