Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Cate

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 4, 1941No. 3634PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment' for the plaintiff in a personal injury suit. Appellants urge that the verdict of the jury was excessive, and that a- motion for a new trial on this ground was erroneously denied. It does not appear that the trial judge committed any abuse of discretion. The court stated: “The court has given careful consideration to the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses relating to the question of damages and it is our independent judgment that the verdict responds truly to the real merits of the controversy on the evidence submitted, and that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Teche Lines, Inc. v. BoyetteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  5. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. ProffittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Bucher v. KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  3. United States v. GrigalauskasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  4. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. ZermaniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  5. Caldwell v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API