Legal Opinion
Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Pratt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1924No. 4036PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error, William Pratt, as guardian of Ernest Pratt, a minor, brought action to recover damages from the Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Company, for personal injuries sustained by Ernest Pratt on the 20th day of February, 1918. alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the Taxicab Company in the operation of one of its vehicles in the city of Detroit, Mich. At the time Ernest Pratt sustained the injuries complained of, he was six years of age. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $35,000. A motion for new trial was overruled, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. MindsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. ProffittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Virginian Ry. Co. v. ArmentroutCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Cain v. Alpha SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Houston Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Blakeman v. GoppWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Public Utilities Corp. of Arkansas v. McNaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.